vendredi 22 mai 2015

Lhc?

Looking for feedback. Would you say this report would suffice for a LHC especially if audited. If yes, please say why as well.

Thanks!

Gender: Female
Height:
Weight:
BSA:
Study date: 14-May-2015
Study #:
Fluoro time:
DMS ACC #:

Allergies: IBUPROFEN

SUMMARY:

-- CARDIAC STRUCTURES:
-- Global left ventricular function was normal. EF estimated was 65 %.

DISPOSITION: The patient left the catheterization laboratory in stable
condition.

VENTRICLES: There was no diagnostic evidence of left ventricular regional
wall motion abnormalities. Global left ventricular function was normal. EF
estimated was 65 %.

CORONARY CIRCULATION: Left main: The vessel was short. Angiography showed
no evidence of disease. LAD: The vessel was normal sized. Angiography
showed minor luminal irregularities. 1st diagonal: The vessel was large
sized. Angiography showed minor luminal irregularities. Circumflex: The
vessel was normal sized. Angiography showed minor luminal irregularities.
1st obtuse marginal: The vessel was large sized (co-dominant). Angiography
showed minor luminal irregularities. The artery bifurcated into two medium
sized vessels. RCA: The vessel was medium to large sized. Angiography
showed minor luminal irregularities.

PROCEDURE: The risks and alternatives of the procedures and conscious
sedation were explained to the patient and informed consent was obtained.
The patient was brought to the cath lab and placed on the table. The
planned puncture sites were prepped and draped in the usual sterile
fashion. A timeout was performed prior to the start of the case.

COMPLICATIONS:
No apparent procedural complications.
Estimated blood loss: 10 ml.
Specimens removed: none.

PROCEDURE COMPLETION: The patient tolerated the procedure well.

Prepared and E-signed by

Signed 14-May-2015 09:31:30

HEMODYNAMIC TABLES



Lhc?

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire